资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。
2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
剧中相关商品热度飙升 热播剧为啥能成“带货王”****** 《狂飙》火了。这部反黑题材的电视剧自播出后口碑炸裂,收视率一路狂飙,剧中相关商品也热度飙升:安欣警官破案用的电脑品牌引关注,剧中的美食肠粉、猪脚面火出圈,剧中关键角色高启强的“成功秘笈”《孙子兵法》更是成为电商平台销冠……热播剧的影响力和带动力可见一斑。 这些年,随着电视剧产业高质量发展,一部剧带火一件商品、一个景点乃至一座城市的例子屡见不鲜。当年《长安十二时辰》热播带火临潼火晶柿子等陕西美食;《安家》热播后,上海老严包子铺的原型门口排起长队;《梦华录》热播让人们对象征传统文化的汉服和茶饮心向往之……一些敏锐的商家抓住热点,借势营销,赚得盆满钵满。这是很多品牌绞尽脑汁搞花式营销、主播们坐在直播间讲上一天也未必能达到的效果。 热播剧为啥能成“带货王”?作为最贴近大众的文艺形式之一,影视作品具有强大的溢出效应和传播效应,能够潜移默化影响人们的生活方式和消费行为,从而带动文化产品和一般商品的消费热潮。尤其是在如今这个播出多平台、收看多屏幕的时代,一部电视剧的播放量动辄百亿次,抵达人群之广、产生辐射力之大不可小觑。 影视作品拉动生产消费大有文章可做。用好热播剧的带货力无疑是消费市场捕捉流量、挖掘存量的关键一招。如何让电视剧更好地为消费市场再添一把火?在这方面,影视工业更为成熟的国家有比较丰富的经验。比如,韩国电视剧就是通过有意识地策划,为韩国的旅游、服装、化妆品、食品、手机等行业带来巨大品牌溢出效应,使这些产业获得更大市场空间,电视剧不仅输出了韩国文化,还培养了“韩国制造”的消费市场,达到两全其美的传播效果。 近年来,国产电视剧也开始有意识地为民族产业“代言”。不过,一些电视剧一味急功近利,没有把主要精力用在创作上,也未深入研究如何更巧妙地与消费市场结合,过度植入或“硬”植入广告内容,让消费者的观剧体验大打折扣。这些剧尽管因为满足了品牌方的广告宣传需求而获利,却因剧情拉胯而翻车,品牌最终也没有获得预期的传播效果。如果作品本身是浮夸的、空洞的,观众就很难认同剧中植入的价值理念,更不会为其想带的“货”埋单。 作为文化产品,电视剧的真正意义不仅是创造多少收视率、经济价值,更重要的是满足人们的精神文化需求,引领人们树立正确的价值取向。《狂飙》之所以能成为“带货王”,关键是引发了大众的情感共鸣,有令人可亲、可信、可感的人物形象作支撑。润物无声更能深入人心,靠剧情打动吸引观众,这样的“带货王”才有更广泛持久的影响力。(经济日报) (文图:赵筱尘 巫邓炎) [责编:天天中] 阅读剩余全文() |